Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Imaging
Coronary Plaque Characteristics in Patients With Mild Chronic Kidney Disease
– Analysis by 320-Row Area Detector Computed Tomography –
Hideki KawaiMasayoshi SaraiSadako MotoyamaHiroto HarigayaHajime ItoYoshihiro SandaShankar BiswasHirofumi AnnoJunichi IshiiToyoaki MuroharaYukio Ozaki
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2012 Volume 76 Issue 6 Pages 1436-1441

Details
Abstract

Background: The differences in the coronary plaque characteristics between patients with mild chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 30-59ml⋅min-1⋅1.73m-2) and those without CKD (eGFR ≥60) by 320-row area detector computed tomography (CT) have not been studied. Methods and Results: We enrolled 487 patients undergoing coronary CT angiography with suspected stable coronary artery disease (mean age: 66.6±10.8 years, 131 with mild CKD) and analyzed 6,352 segments. All coronary plaques were characterized for the presence of vessel remodeling, plaque consistency and the disposition of coronary calcification, and a plaque with positive vessel remodeling and/or low-attenuation was defined as high risk. The number of diseased segments per patient was higher in mild CKD patients than in those without CKD (4.61±3.83 vs. 2.95±3.11, P<0.0001). The prevalence of severe stenosis (≥70% luminal diameter) was significantly higher in cases of mild CKD than in no CKD (35.1% vs. 19.4%, P=0.0003), but there was no significant difference in the prevalence of high-risk plaque (13.0% vs. 9.8%, P=0.3189). Conclusions: The severity of coronary artery stenosis was higher in the patients with mild CKD, though there was no significant difference in the prevalence of high-risk plaque. We suggest that the high risk of coronary events in patients with CKD is related to the severity of stenosis rather than to the characteristics of plaque. (Circ J 2012; 76: 1436-1441)

Content from these authors
© 2012 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top